Home » The Oil Spill Doesn’t Matter

with 2 comments

Both these stories are from @YuleHeibel.

“Sobering thought: all that oil from the spill would have ended up in our environment anyway, burnt into the very air we breathe.” – @ToriKlassen

As Tori Klassen notes, the Deepwater Horizon’s oil wasn’t just going to sit in the ground: it was going to end up in the environment one way or another. I haven’t seen any comparative analysis on whether the climate or the ocean is better able to handle that oil. (Obviously burning it to clean up the spill is the worst of both.) The ocean’s ecosystems are collapsing, but that’s partially due to climate change. Both the ocean and the climate are reasonably good at dealing with waste and maintaining homeostasis – otherwise we’d already be dead.

The Gulf of Mexico is a big, messy, visible place to have a spill, but Nigeria has groundwater, wetland and coast spills all the time. Like all natural disasters, people only pay attention when it’s sudden instead of gradual and in somewhere other than Africa. But maybe it takes a loud wakeup call like Deepwater Horizon to get people to move toward renewable energy, which will result in lower demand for Nigerian oil.

We need to get better at assessing environmental impact besides looking at how much map changes color. Is offshore drilling in BC worse than the Alberta tarsands? How much should I sacrifice in my personal life to reduce my oil consumption?

Written by Jared

June 4th, 2010 at 11:20 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with

2 Responses to 'The Oil Spill Doesn’t Matter'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'The Oil Spill Doesn’t Matter'.

  1. I haven’t seen any comparative analysis on whether the climate or the ocean is better able to handle that oil.

    I haven’t seen any analysis of this either, but it seems to me that it is clearly much, much worse for that oil to end up spilled in one location.

    1. The greenhouse gases and other pollutants that would have been produced if the spilled oil had been extracted, made into fuel, and then burned would have been diffused through the atmosphere or, at least, through a level of the atmosphere. The major problem of the oil spill is not the eventual diffusion of it throughout the ocean, the major problem is that it kills things that it passes and coats at a high concentration. I think a more appropriate competitive analysis would be of the affects of this oil diffused throughout the ocean versus throughout the atmosphere.
    2. World production of oil is about 80 million barrels per day. The estimated size of the gulf oil leak is about 20 thousand barrels per day. My point is that if the oil was being burnt instead of spilled, it would amount to a tiny fraction of a fraction of the total greenhouse gases and other air pollutants released for a few months.
    3. A smaller point: About one-fifth of petroleum products are not fuel that is burnt. So not all of the spilled oil would have ended up in the atmosphere.

    (Obviously burning it [oil] to clean up the spill is the worst of both.)

    I don’t think this is at all obvious. The most pertinent questions are: how many litres of petroleum-derived fuel is used to clean up each litre of the spilled oil, until a sufficient amount of oil is cleaned up; and, what is the impact of those litres of burned fuel versus the amount of cleaned up spilled oil. As explained above, it seems that this oil spill is a much worse problem than the effects of the atmospheric pollutants from a similar amount of oil. So, unless it costs a lot more than I’d think to clean up much of the spill, then it seems to me obvious that cleaning up the oil is the best option.

    Nigeria has groundwater, wetland and coast spills all the time. Like all natural disasters, people only pay attention when it’s sudden instead of gradual and in somewhere other than Africa.

    This is a good point. I think that the best way to improve this situation is continued, increasing trade and commerce with Africa. According to the Environmental Kuznet’s Curve, after people achieve a per capita income of about $4000, they start demanding that their local environmental conditions be improved.

    Don

    6 Jun 10 at 4:35 pm

  2. Excellent rebuttal, Don! Maybe we need Fair Trade oil from Africa?

    Jared

    6 Jun 10 at 6:26 pm

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.