Posts Tagged ‘review’

Review: 1491: New Revelations of the Americas Before Columbus

Friday, September 25th, 2009

This is a follow-up to Guns, Germs and Steel that could be called Just Germs: it’s not that the natives lost to the colonialists in armed combat, it’s that there were no natives left to fight by the time colonializing started in earnest. The colonialists waltzed into what was effectively a ghost continent. This created the myth of the Noble Savage, living in harmony with nature; the truth is that native civilizations were decimated to the point where they could no long manipulate nature.

Charles Mann is a journalist (Jared Diamond is a professor of physiology and birds) but the book’s research feels thorough and up-to-date: I haven’t found any major academic criticism online. The book itself is over 9000 pages long due to huge amounts of historical background. The background is quite interesting, but I think a lot of it could be cut without weakening the argument.

The first theme is why the Algonquians didn’t drive the Pilgrims into the sea. The unnecessary background is about Tisquantum, the Pilgrim’s Uncle Tom. As Mann tells it, his story is much more interesting and epic than Pocahontas and John Smith. (1491 should be optioned!)

The second theme is the pre-European colonializations of America by humans. The key question addressed here is whether the Indians are “responsible” for the extinction of most potential livestock and beasts-of-burden in America. There’s lots of interesting information in this chapter, but Mann doesn’t manage to give a definitive answer to the question.

The third theme is the fall of the Inca Empire. The Aztecs and Mayans get significantly less space, probably because they’re better covered in Guns, Germs and Steel and the Incas should have been better positioned to resist the Spanish: the Inca Empire is one of the largest continuous empires by latitude that has ever existed. The only two things that ever made it over the Andes are corn and disease and Mann is unfortunately unable to offer an explanation for why disease hit the Incas before the Spanish arrived.

The book is focused on the civilizations that one would reasonably expect to resist conquest. I was expecting the book to be about the state of America before colonialization. For example, James Douglas chose the location for Fort Victoria because he admired the natural rolling fields, which were in fact being slashed & burned for camas by the Songhees.

Review: A Luxury Car

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

I recently drove a Lexus. It was the “grey” model, I believe. I’m cautious when driving an unfamiliar car, so I can’t tell you how fast it goes from 0 to 100. I guess it was nice to drive. But what blew me away was the keyless ignition system:

I put a key fob in my pocket. Sitting in the driver’s seat, I pushed the start button to turn the car on. When I got to the parking lot I pushed the button again to turn the car off. Walking away, I had to touch the fob again to lock the car.

Half an hour latter I trudge toward the car, loaded down with groceries. The door automatically unlock as I approach. I still have to open the door, but depositing the groceries is easy. I’m back on the road without once having to squeeze my fingers into my tight jeans.

Since I bike to work I’m always having to fiddle with locks: bike locks, house doors, storage locker codes, office radio cards, etc. If I could have keyless entry to all of them it would be like a dream.

Review: Generation Kill

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

The US military figured if journalists were embedded in combat units, their reporting would be more pro-war than if they just sat in a Kuwaiti briefing room. The plan was that reporting would get biased by a combination of esprit de corps and internal psyops. But they didn’t embed journalists with commanders who can see the big picture; they embedded them in combat units: theirs is not to question why.

The HBO miniseries Generation Kill is a perfect product of embedding: the war is misguided and all high-ranking officers are either insane or incompetent. The journalist is embedded as a grunt and, sure enough, he idolizes his father and grandfather figures: the Sergeant in charge of his team and the Lieutenant in charge of his platoon. These characters can do no wrong: bad things always happen because higher-ups screwed up. The journalist’s peers can do kooky things like shoot Iraqi kids, but they get redeemed in the end.

Generation Kill’s simplistic morality and character arcs make it fun to watch in the same way most action and fantasy movies are fun to watch. The tone of the first half of the series is closest to Jarhead: war is about waiting. The second half mixes in some Black Hawk Down battles against video-game towelheads. If you enjoyed both those films, you’ll enjoy Generation Kill, only less so.

Your Professional Brand

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Tom Peters is a popular post-industrial management theorist. Way back in 1997 he wrote an article about workers seeing themselves as a product with a brand. At the time it was fashionable to speculate that employees were old-meme and soon we’d all be consultants hired for project work. But the idea applies almost as well to employees working their way up a corporate ladder.

One book I’ve read on personal branding is Soaring on Your Strengths, which emphasizes that a brand must fill a market niche. The “best overall” niche is hard to fill, it’s better to focus on what you’re good at and, just as importantly, what you like. Rather than try to correct your weaknesses, get better at your strengths.

The key trick here is to go from a list of previous jobs on your resume to a brand. Since mission statements were the fashionable strategic planning tool at the time, Peters suggests:

Start by writing your own mission statement, to guide you as CEO of Me Inc. What turns you on?…What’s your personal definition of success?…However you answer these questions, search relentlessly for job or project opportunities that fit your mission statement.

Soaring on Your Strengths guides you through a list to get at your brand essence:

  • equity (mostly education)
  • talents & core competencies
  • image & reputation
  • passion
  • values

Once you’ve got your brand, the idea is that it guides your resumes, cover letters, elevator pitches, professional associations, wardrobe, etc. Soaring on Your Strengths gives a bit of advice on that, but I think the basic idea is pretty obvious (and SoYS won’t help you master it).

Review: Star Trek XI

Monday, May 11th, 2009

At 95% Fresh, this will be one of the most critically-acclaimed Hollywood films of the year. The critics are surely ranking it on a sliding scale:

  • reboots tend to be disasters, this isn’t; and,
  • as a crowd-pleasing summer blockbuster, it’s above average

It does not have the soul of Star Trek. Gene Roddenberry’s Trek is about thinly-veiled metaphors for philosophical and moral dilemmas combined with gee-whiz space opera. The camp naturally occurs: mid-century technology speculation and scifi ideas can’t be taken seriously, and it’s a ludicrous setting for exploring deep issues.

To be fair, modern audiences probably couldn’t handle true camp like that. So Abrams had a choice: either a bubble-gum action movie or a serious reimagining like Battlestar Galactica (Batman Begins is a half-hearted attempt at this). He chose the former; I am underwhelmed.

While I was watching, I couldn’t help but thinking that I’d rather be watching the BSG version:

Kirk’s father sacrifices the lives of hundreds of Starfleet seamen to save his newborn son. 20 years later, James joins Starfleet, the strong arm of the Federation’s colonialization program, to escape a shotgun wedding on Earth. Spock, child of a dying culture, joins to prove his superiority to the humans he paradoxically despises. Bones is right about the danger of transporters: they operate just within Starfleet’s acceptable loss rate. Sulu is in the closet since the Federation has officially genetically-engineered away the “gay defect”. Uhura openly has a relationship with one of her senior officers while enduring constant sexual harassment from another. etc…

Review: How to Talk About Books You Haven’t Read

Friday, May 8th, 2009

I started this post while eavesdropping on the bus while a student describes “this great book he read”…I look it up and it hasn’t been published yet. Clearly he has read, or is at least familiar with, How to Talk About Books You Haven’t Read.

It turns out that the title of this book is misleading: it only has space to argue that if you talk about a book you haven’t read, you are saying the same things as someone who has. It doesn’t give positive recommendations for how to talk about books and doesn’t say how not reading a book puts you in a better position to talk about it. The argument is as follows:

While reading a book, you’re forgetting most of the detail
By the end of a book, you’ve already forgotten a lot about the beginning. Every day after that you forget more. At what point do you become equivalent to someone who hasn’t read it?
You can tell as much by skimming a book as by reading it
Very rarely do we read books with the rigor of a scholar. There must be a point of diminishing returns in reading, who’s to say it’s not at skimming speed?
What matters about a book is not it’s contents but it’s context in society and intellectual frameworks
Summed up by the joke “you know you’re a grad student when…you find the bibliographies of books more interesting than the actual text” – and who are grad students if not experts at reading?

A lot of reviewers believe that this book is satire, but I think they underestimate the realism of a French literary professor. The last point goes along with contemporary literary theory by saying post-structural analysis is better than other ways of understanding a text.

Review: Veer

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

Veer explores America’s fast-growing bicycling culture by profiling five people whose lives are inextricably tied to bicycling and the bike-centric social groups they belong to. The film follows these characters over the course of a year, offering a behind-the-scenes look at their personal struggles and triumphs. Veer examines what it means to be part of a community, and how social movements are formed.

There are two movies here. The bleeding-heart documentary (which has nothing to do with “culture” or social groups):

  • Steven Kung runs an organization that teaches bike workshops; there’s some theme of international touring that gets mentioned but never explained
  • Gabe Graff teaches bike safety to kids: he is very earnest and never shown interacting with other adults
  • Scott Bricker lobbies the state government (although I’m not sure how a non-Oregonian was supposed to figure this out) on pro-bike traffic laws

And the journalistic look at the narrative of Portland bike culture: The zoobombers form the core of Portland’s bike social circle. Around them is built a summer bike festival. Lauren Pederson and some zoobombers got together to form the women’s ironic dance troupe The Sprockettes, which is prominently featured in the summer bike festival. Gabe Tiller, king of the zoobombers, and his queen* do a bunch of stuff at the summer festival and are also key players at the alternative winter bike festival.

I think the two themes were mashed into one documentary because the community organizers are too boring and the enthusiasts are too vapid to stand alone. The editing is very tight, so the material may have simply not worked in any other structure. The camera-work and sound is also top-notch, and the pacing is relatively good.

* Vancouver-based activist Ifny Lachance – thanks Dan!

Review: Caffè Artigiano/Victoria

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

I’m mostly excited about having an Artigiano in Victoria because it has a better location and hopefully better hours than Victoria’s other 1st-tier coffee shops. I don’t expect better coffee, because Discovery, 2% Jazz, and Habit are, by all accounts, competitive with the best in Cascadia. In fact, I find Artigiano’s espresso to be a little bitter.

I’m sitting in Artigiano/Victoria for the first time. I’ve been in Artigiano/Hornby a few times in the last month, so this is a perfect time to contrast the locations.

Artigiano/Victoria is in a two-story-high hotel lobby, strictly partitioned from the hotel by a human-height wood and glass wall. I would have made the wall all-wood because the coffee shop is not so small that it would become claustrophobic without the glass and seeing the hotel is odd. Hanging from the soaring ceilings are huge, round lamps with soft light: they’re interesting, but a far cry from the cozy, fake-stone, lowered ceilings of Artigiano/Hornby. Overall, I’d be less likely to sit in this location than a Mirage or Habit – it feels more like a place to get coffee to go (which ruins the experience of a high-end espresso).

The coffee, however, is better than Artigiano/Hornby’s: more smooth and with a better flavor balance. It’s a shame Artigiano couldn’t get a better location for their first store in Victoria, but I’ll be back for the coffee.

Another Watchmen Review

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

I’ve only read Watchmen once. I enjoyed the major theme: the lonely god contrasted with the only-too-human heroes. But I felt like I missed tons of detail. And I’m not talking about all the passing references that Moore is famous for, but many of the basic character aspects. I don’t feel like the comic did much to prepare me for the movie.

Watchmen (film) is getting surprisingly lukewarm reviews. Onecommon criticism is that the plot is too convoluted. But I found the film just big enough that I could load it into my head, then disassemble and rearrange it to figure out all what’s going on. Maybe it was because all the filler like Tales of the Black Freighter got cut?

And now I see the story has amazing character depth. Who cares whether it subverts Reaganism or deconstructs the (now routinely deconstructed) superhero genre? It’s simply a much better story than The Dark Knight.

The title sequence that explains the alternate history is amazing. But you’ll have to find it yourself online because Warner Bros are idiots.

The ending is much tighter than the original even if it has a different meaning than the goofy squid. The music is over-the-top in the way a comic movie soundtrack should be. The acting is good, including:

  • Dr Manhatten’s condescension, now with action head-tilt
  • The Second Nite Owl’s self pitying romance-fu
  • Ozymandias’s demonstration that in real life Superman would be an asshole

My only complaints are that the script is too faithful to Moore’s sometimes-cheesy dialog and the visceral violence added by Snyder feels a little out of place.