<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MentalPolyphonics &#187; quebec</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/tag/quebec/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com</link>
	<description>Committees exist to share blame.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:18:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What is Quebec&#8217;s Role in Carbon Emissions?</title>
		<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/what-is-quebecs-role-in-carbon-emissions</link>
		<comments>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/what-is-quebecs-role-in-carbon-emissions#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quebec]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mentalpolyphonics.com/?p=9423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael tells me that the National Post says that Quebec should hold their tongue on the oil sands as long as they&#8217;re accepting equilization payments from that revenue and burning lots of the gasoline themselves. Via Andrew Potter&#8217;s blog, the Ottawa Citizen says that Quebec voters should stop voting for a party whose main platform [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael tells me that <a href="http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fullcomment/archive/2009/12/15/national-post-editorial-board-oilsands-hypocrisy-in-copenhagen.aspx" title="editorial">the National Post says that Quebec should hold their tongue</a> on the oil sands as long as they&#8217;re accepting equilization payments from that revenue and burning lots of the gasoline themselves.</p>
<p>Via Andrew Potter&#8217;s blog, the Ottawa Citizen says that Quebec voters should stop voting for a party whose main platform plank is increasing equilization payments and <a href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Doomed+dirty/2301014/story.html" title="editorial">start voting to green up the whole country</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/what-is-quebecs-role-in-carbon-emissions/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

