Home » Review: District 9 (Spoliers)

with 5 comments

After three days of torture Christ Jesus Christopher Johnson flies up into the sky with a promise to return and save his people. Some on the right speculate he’ll return violently.

Saul Wikus starts as a member of The Sanhedrin MNU, persecuting the outsiders because messianic cults prawns aren’t kosher. Eventually he converts to the cause, becoming St. Paul an alien.

There’re no plots like the old plots, eh Blomkamp? It’s about time someone did more Alien Nation, anyway. Cat food? Milk? Get it? Anybody? Is this thing on?

District 9 has a couple of problems with characterization. First, Wikus (the protag.) is an annoying unintelligent coward — even after he’s had his catalytic I-have-the-Golden-Fleece hero-moment. He’s very hard to get on-side with as a protagonist. This, though, could well have been by design. I could see humanity being very difficult to get along with, very stupid and fickle, if a being wasn’t used to us.

Wikus is a complex character, fine, but you really need complex villains for difficult protagonists to shine. The villain in the story is humanity, but that’s far too big to make dramatic sense. We whittle it down to MNU, okay, a couple of bad old-guy corporate-cog suits but still too nebulous to really work. Our antagonist targeting systems settle on Venter, the terminal testosterone case merc death-squad leader.

Except just being a fascist jock with a gun really isn’t enough characterization to make Venter an effective foil for Wikus, and so the protagonist’s characterization crumbles. Without Vader, Luke is just a whining farm boy — our enemies bring out the best in us.

Setting is the third character, and it’s almost there. The mockumentary style has problems when you stray from it to do private scenes — suspension of disbelief gets a bit turbulent. The movie I would have liked to see would have shown Venter as a soldier guarding humanity from the violent prawns. Get us on his side, then show his fall: One day a prawn eats his wife and kid. Okay, now there’s a reason Venter hates the aliens, a reason he’s a mercenary for MNU, and as a special bonus we’re on his side because prawns are scary.

Then we segue to Mikus the slum administrator and build even more rapport with him — he’s kinda brave protecting us from those mean aliens. Finally my imaginary version of the film shows us that we were wrong to hate — we build sympathy with the visitors as normal — but Venter can’t forgive and forget so he’s destroyed.

Then Venter isn’t one dimensional, he’s tragic. Mikus gets a good foil which explains his vacillation somewhat more, and the setting is used to pull the audience in and really hammer the theme. Our point of view shifts from Venter’s to Mikus’, from Legion-backed-Sanhedrin to Disciples of the Living Christ. Oh well, missed opportunity.

On the whole I quite liked it. The graphics are very tight, helped by the shakeycam and use of authentic humans (bumping through the uncanny valley). The gun battles are pretty good — the alien weapons fun.

The exposition of the back story is masterful and the first contact scenario’s premise is satisfyingly unique: Aliens show up and we have to cut our way in to the derelict saucer and rescue them with our awful state-of-the-art social workers. The cognitive dissonance that idea created in me had the pleasantly discomforting quality that theory generates when it slams into reality. “Wait, these are aliens with an interstellar craft and we have to give them aid? Fucking reality never works out how you expect…”

Written by Jack

August 29th, 2009 at 11:20 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

5 Responses to 'Review: District 9 (Spoliers)'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Review: District 9 (Spoliers)'.

  1. ” He’s very hard to get on-side with as a protagonist. This, though, could well have been by design.” I felt this was purposeful too.

    I really enjoyed the first 20 or so minutes. It was a social commentary/mockumentary and then all of a sudden it went to predictable action cheese which felt out of place and made us laugh at it. Then it got better with the whole who is good, who is bad, we will never truly have the answer because humanity is never that black and white stuff at the end.
    Still not sure if I enjoyed it. Think I need to see it again.

    Karen

    31 Aug 09 at 1:28 am

  2. All of my movie reviews are starting to break down films into notes for my notional rewrites. I’m far more excited about my ideas about films than about the movies themselves, especially in this case.

    The same thing happened with Drag Me To Hell — I liked the movie because I liked the way I wished it ended. This review strategy might not make any sense.

    The first 20 minutes — funny you should pick that time because it’s meaningful to screenwriting — were quite good. My brother and I have been talking about that. It’s as though the film starts showing you Wikus as a background character and you expect that at any moment you’re going to cut away to the real hero, but then that never happens. Neat effect.

    Jack

    31 Aug 09 at 5:09 am

  3. Yea. I heard it was based on a short which was a social commentary about apartheid. I would like to see that short.

    Karen

    31 Aug 09 at 11:07 am

  4. Your wish is my command:

    Now that I watch it again I saw it on BB back a couple of years ago. Good job, bOING2.

    Jack

    31 Aug 09 at 10:24 pm

  5. [...] District 9 [...]

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.