Home » Intentional Climate Change is Better than Accidental

with 2 comments

This New Yorker book review of Superfreak-onomics implies that Levitt and Dubner show their true colours as right wingers, just like all economists, even renegades.* ;) They downplay the seriousness of climate change and suggest geoengineering is a better solution than restricting carbon emissions. The review quotes Al Gore:

We are already involved in a massive, unplanned planetary experiment. We should not begin yet another planetary experiment in the hope that it will somehow magically cancel out the effects of the one we already have.

I agree with the criticism in the article right up until the end where she mentions that Freeman Dyson has proposed genetically engineering trees to grow on Mars. The value of running yet another planetary experiment on Earth is that we will learn how to terraform other planets!

I’ll trade a 20° Earth for a 28° Venus and a 7° Mars.

* Exception: Richard Thaler supports carbon taxes in Nudge.

Written by Jared

December 11th, 2009 at 3:22 pm

2 Responses to 'Intentional Climate Change is Better than Accidental'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Intentional Climate Change is Better than Accidental'.

  1. The Superfreak-onomics authors have responded to the criticism in a whole bunch of blog posts. But I don’t care: terraforming is awesome.

    Jared

    11 Dec 09 at 3:26 pm

  2. Jared, I agree. Lets use nuclear weapons to ride the world of the Al-Qaeda and let a nuclear winter fix our global warming problems

    Fred

    11 Dec 09 at 5:19 pm

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.