<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GRS Lecture Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/grs-lecture-series/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/grs-lecture-series</link>
	<description>Committees exist to share blame.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:15:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/grs-lecture-series/comment-page-1#comment-72095</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 19:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/grs-lecture-series#comment-72095</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s totally it, too: The arrogant assumption that our culture is so dominant, so important, that it has to be careful about naming its parentage generally for fear of offending others. It&#039;s not like Chinese scholars call it &quot;The Chinese Warring States Period&quot; -- it&#039;s just called &quot;The Warring States Period&quot;, even though we had warring states in Europe too.

There&#039;s a weird kind of scholarly self-loathing or willful academic ignorance of history there, certainly a lack of poetry: The &quot;Greek and Roman&quot; period sounds kludgy compared to The &quot;Classical&quot; period. Worse, it disenfranchises all those Celts, Saxons, proto-Germans, Carthaginians, Franks, Slavs, Egyptians, Persians, Africans, Indians, Palestinians, &amp; etc who contributed to our society! Racists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s totally it, too: The arrogant assumption that our culture is so dominant, so important, that it has to be careful about naming its parentage generally for fear of offending others. It&#8217;s not like Chinese scholars call it &#8220;The Chinese Warring States Period&#8221; &#8212; it&#8217;s just called &#8220;The Warring States Period&#8221;, even though we had warring states in Europe too.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a weird kind of scholarly self-loathing or willful academic ignorance of history there, certainly a lack of poetry: The &#8220;Greek and Roman&#8221; period sounds kludgy compared to The &#8220;Classical&#8221; period. Worse, it disenfranchises all those Celts, Saxons, proto-Germans, Carthaginians, Franks, Slavs, Egyptians, Persians, Africans, Indians, Palestinians, &#038; etc who contributed to our society! Racists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/grs-lecture-series/comment-page-1#comment-72094</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/grs-lecture-series#comment-72094</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There’s a series of Greek and Roman Studies lectures (they should call it “Classics” — why don’t they?)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That would be privileging Greek and Roman society of that era above others, wouldn&#039;t it?  Eurocentric labels must be destroyed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There’s a series of Greek and Roman Studies lectures (they should call it “Classics” — why don’t they?)</p></blockquote>
<p>That would be privileging Greek and Roman society of that era above others, wouldn&#8217;t it?  Eurocentric labels must be destroyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

