<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash Versus Accrual in Government Accounting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/cash-versus-accrual-in-government-accounting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/cash-versus-accrual-in-government-accounting</link>
	<description>you should NOT EAT INFINITE PIZZA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/cash-versus-accrual-in-government-accounting/comment-page-1#comment-71340</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mentalpolyphonics.com/?p=4331#comment-71340</guid>
		<description>My bad Andrew, fixed. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad Andrew, fixed. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/cash-versus-accrual-in-government-accounting/comment-page-1#comment-71332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mentalpolyphonics.com/?p=4331#comment-71332</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the explanation!

My understanding is that the BC Liberal government has never claimed that they have a balanced budget with respect to capital expenditures. They borrow against the future to &lt;em&gt;build stuff&lt;/em&gt; but not provide services.

I think neither party can get into a discussion about that because voters&#039; eyes glaze over...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the explanation!</p>
<p>My understanding is that the BC Liberal government has never claimed that they have a balanced budget with respect to capital expenditures. They borrow against the future to <em>build stuff</em> but not provide services.</p>
<p>I think neither party can get into a discussion about that because voters&#8217; eyes glaze over&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://mentalpolyphonics.com/posts/cash-versus-accrual-in-government-accounting/comment-page-1#comment-71329</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew MacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mentalpolyphonics.com/?p=4331#comment-71329</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the careful read, Jack. 

A few details though:

1. You missed a decimal point. It should be a $1.4 billion deficit, not $14 billion;

2. I was reporting what Statistics Canada put out yesterday. I&#039;m not sure why they use cash basis accounting, but they do;

3. I was very clear in my report that there is a big difference in how StatsCan and how the government look at the books. Whether that accounts for the large difference of opinion on the size of the deficit we will see when the public accounts are released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the careful read, Jack. </p>
<p>A few details though:</p>
<p>1. You missed a decimal point. It should be a $1.4 billion deficit, not $14 billion;</p>
<p>2. I was reporting what Statistics Canada put out yesterday. I&#8217;m not sure why they use cash basis accounting, but they do;</p>
<p>3. I was very clear in my report that there is a big difference in how StatsCan and how the government look at the books. Whether that accounts for the large difference of opinion on the size of the deficit we will see when the public accounts are released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
