Author Archive

Microsurveying for Victoria’s Community Plan

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Very few people care about municipal issues. Local governments have a real problem just getting a mandate from an election, never mind consulting their residents on ongoing issues. Sure, the vocal minority is happy to give the mayor a piece of their mind, but that’s not a representative sample.

The planning department for the City of Victoria has a micro survey with just two questions, in the hopes of getting as many responses as possible. They’ve identified twelve issues, from affordable housing to heritage protection. For each issue, you specify how well it’s currently being addressed. Then you get 10 points to allocate between the issues to advise them how to spread their attention. It’s quick, elegant and it gets my stamp of approval as a voting system.

Dan, who is apparently an honorary member of the planning department, has come up with another micro survey tool. On Twitter, post a tweet how you imagine Victoria in 30 years (add the #VicOCP hashtag). If you don’t have a Twitter account, add a comment to this post with few enough characters and I’ll retweet it (eg: “RT Jack:[125 characters]#VicOCP”). Here’s mine:

Distinct. Dense: 200,000 people. Bike & pedestrian oriented. Diverse industries; most of CRD’s jobs. Amalgamated. #VicOCP

Prove Yule Heibel wrong that we have no vision for our city. :)

Oscars 2010 Best and Worst Dressed Men

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Best


Colin Firth wore a shawl-collar tuxedo to the Golden Globes. Firth followed the rule that the Oscars is more formal than the Globes by wearing peak lapels, which are more formal than a shawl collar. The fit is better and I dig his bowtie and studs, but he’s docked points for an extra jacket button.


Taylor Lautner similarly demonstrated that the Globes are creative black-tie while the Oscars are a more serious matter. His jacket sleeves and pants were too long, but the thin shawl lapel with narrow trousers is definitely the fashionable look for a tuxedo.


Christoph Waltz actually wore the same fashionable style as Lautner with distinctive pointy shoes. His sleeves are a little better and he remembered to leave his watch at home.

Notable


Bradley Cooper wore an unfortunately-styled tuxedo over an awesome double-breasted formal vest.

Worst


James Cameron, on the other hand, wore a lounge vest that’s too small, making him look like a sausage (maybe it was supposed to act as a girdle?). Combined with a four-in-hand tie and aqua pocket square, he looked like the loser he turned out to be.


Jeremy Renner combined a bad vest with the tie and pocket square he wore to his highschool prom.


Jamie Fox wore a smoking jacket?!


And Robert Downey Junior dressed in a rumpled child costume complete with clip-on bowtie: so much for most improved!

Where is My People’s History?

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Jack and The Tyee have both criticized the latest edition of How to Be a Canadian by the Ministry of Citizenship and Immigration. It made me think about the book A People’s History of the United States (which I haven’t read and don’t plan to because I don’t care about the US). It’s a history of oppression in the US that looks at major national events and oppressive episodes from the point of view of the least powerful.

Apparently A People’s History is an invaluable teaching tool for critical American History. But from what I’ve read, none of the spin-offs (A People’s History of the World, in particular) are as good.

What do you get when you Google “A People’s History of Canada”? The historical TV series published by the government. It’s a nice project for teaching people the framework of Canadian history, but even a sometimes-rogue Crown corporation like the CBC can’t be expected to produce truly critical history.

Does a popular critical history of Canada exist? If not, why doesn’t someone make one?

How To: Score Aerial Skiing

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Five judges produce a score for air and a score for form. Air is covers the takeoff, height and distance and is scored out of 2 points (why height and distance are not objectively measured, I have no idea). Form is the body and skate position in the air, scored out of 5 points. The air and form scores of each judge are added together, then the high and low scores are discarded.

Two judges score the landing out of 3 points. The average of the two scores is multipled by 3.

For example, Zongyang Jia got 6.1, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6 and 7.0 for his first jump’s air+form. His combined air+form score = 19.5. He got 2.6 and 2.6 for landing. His landing score = 7.8.

Air+form and landing are added together and multiplied by the degree of difficulty. The difficulty is based on breaking the jump into components. The latest scoring seems to give extra difficulty for twists done earlier, but this Ski Federation manual is almost right.

Aerials ramps are so steep that you can only start with a back-flip, so every jump starts with the word “back” (difficulty = 2.0).

All Olympic-class jumps are done in the layout position because the smaller profile means you can twist faster. So the simplest jump is a “back lay” (difficulty = 2.05).

All male Olympic jumpers do triple-flip jumps. Five people in the world have done quadruple-flips, but the risk of landing on your head makes it illegal in competition (aerials has a lot of safety regulations). Each flip is divided by a dash, so the simplest Olympic-class jump is a “back lay – lay – lay” (difficulty = 3.3)

For each flip, you can do from 0 to 3 twists. One twist is described as a “full”, two as a “double full”, three as a “triple full”. I wish more competitors did half, 1.5 (a “rudy”) and 2.5 (a “randy”) twists to mix things up. Thomas Lambert is the only qualifier who regularly does half twists, such as his “back half – randy – full” (difficulty = 4.525).

Most competitors do a total of 4 twists over 3 flips: a quadruple jump. The 2002 gold medal was won with a quintuple jump but Anton Kushnir (DNQ), Jeret Peterson and Warren Shouldice are the only people who have done 5 twists in competition this season (not always successfully). The most difficult jump ever is a “back double full – full – double full” (difficulty = 5.0).

Securing My Groceries

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Transporting groceries from the store to households is a huge portion of food’s carbon footprint. Grocery stores make neighbourhoods feel like communities because they get people walking around and bumping into their neighbours. I’d say if you need to plan to pick-up groceries or get them delivered, then you don’t have food security – never mind how far the food took to get to the store.

500 metres is commonly used in urban planning because it’s the distance the average person walks in 5 minutes (I’ve previously used 400). For groceries, it’s the distance that old people can transport a few days worth of food on foot and young people are willing to “run out” to. Beyond 500 metres people start taking a car.

Alison recently asked me to comment on the viability of a permanent food market in Victoria. I say that’s putting the cart before the horse: many people in Victoria can’t even get to a regular grocery store! Council should figure out how to solve that key environmental, social and security issue before they start worrying about fancy markets.

Here are the 500-metre radii around full-service grocery stores in the municipality of Victoria:

There are food stores that are less than full service. They don’t have butchers, so carnivores who like fresh meat will have to shop somewhere else frequently. They have uneven produce quality and selection. I believe most people who live by these stores will regularly make a trip to a full-service grocery store. You can select the checkbox to display each store on the map:

Oxford Foods

Wellburn’s Market

China Town

Stadacona Food Market

Haultain Grocery

Johnny Weir: The Lady Gaga of Figure Skating

Friday, February 19th, 2010

Let’s face it: figure skating is not the most masculine sport. Unlike all the rest of the Olympic skaters, Johnny Weir acknowledges this fact. Men’s figure skating should be campy. Johnny might be the first major skater to take the sport ironically, the way that Lady Gaga takes her music.

As to the obvious question of his (and every other figure skater’s) sexuality, Johnny responds: “There are some things I keep sacred. My middle name. Who I sleep with. And what kind of hand moisturizer I use.”

Johnny designs his own costumes (just like Lady Gaga) and is going to be retiring from figure skating to pursue a fashion career. I was particularly amused by his short program costume:
Johnny Weir in black and pink

Unfortunately, Johnny doesn’t have the technical ability to get an Olympic medal. (Although Elvis Stojko thinks Evan Lysacek doesn’t either.) I wish there was more of a market for this kind of performance:

Olympics News, Balanced and In Brief

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

Olympic athletes are perfect storms of obsessive disorder and genetic abnormalities. These deviants are entertaining and politically useful, so corporations and governments enable their obsessions. Athletes are aesthetically pleasing: not just when they’re performing or undressing, the emotional rollercoaster of their lives is beautiful*.

I enjoy the Olympics, but to be honest I don’t really care about the individual athletes; I don’t find their performances nor their lives aesthetically pleasing. I like knowing about the sports: statistics, standings, judging, history and all other trivia. What I find most entertaining about the Olympics is all the stuff that goes on around the athletics.

The Tyee has been writing up both sport and non-sport highlights for every day of the Games. They’re quite balanced considering The Tyee’s lefty cred. Given that CTV and other mainstream media aren’t covering the protests and the Cultural Olympiad, I think this is a must-read for everyone who wants to know what’s happening in Vancouver.

* Am I confusing virtue with aesthetics here? Discuss.

Homework: ICBC Should Stay Public

Tuesday, February 16th, 2010

If ICBC were a private-sector monopolist, we would expect to see high prices and high profits. But ICBC is a public entity with no profit mandate and we observe the lowest prices for primary insurance for any province. What can explain these low prices?

A monopoly supplier is a larger organization than a set of competitive suppliers. Large organizations benefit from economies of scale. Monopolists of low-elasticity goods do not need to spend money on marketing. Competitive firms sometimes engage in price wars outside of price equilibria, which is a waste of resources when the war ends in a stalemate.

Private-sector firms are required by their owners or shareholders to “skim” profit off the difference between sales and costs. From the consumer’s point of view, this profit is an inefficiency (it would be cheaper to buy the firm’s inputs directly). Since ICBC has no profit motive, they should be able to provide their product for a slightly lower price. If ICBC suffers a shortfall in revenue, it will be covered by the taxpayers of BC.

Since primary insurance is legally required, the government would likely regulate a competitive market. This regulation, possibly in the form of a commission office, adds an additional cost to BC taxpayers. ICBC currently regulates itself, so essentially it may be impossible to privatize this function.

Insurers’ costs go down when the number and severity of accidents goes down. As a public entity, ICBC can directly offer policy advice on safety, for example the recent ban on cell phone use, to cabinet. A private insurer has more options for reducing costs and even an industry association does not have the lobbying power of a Crown corporation. BC should have less accidents with a public insurance agency than a competitive market, but it is difficult to calculate this benefit.

Car insurance provides opportunity for insider fraud. Despite recent high-profile cases, it may be easier to control corruption with public sector values than private-sector monitoring. Public servants believe that the social cost of fraud is higher than private employees. Lower fraud results in lower costs.

Beware Sketchy Property Managers

Monday, February 15th, 2010

I’ve been looking for apartments in Victoria lately and run into a few property management companies that aren’t following the Residential Tenancy Act. In the hopes of informing other tenants of their rights and punishing bad companies, I’m putting this here so Google picks it up:

  • Apartments R Us Property Management Ltd attempted to get me to pay a non-refundable application deposit for 976 Humboldt St. When I explained that was in violation of s. 15 of the Residential Tenancy Act, he “waived” the deposit.
  • Cornerstone Properties Ltd refused to process my rental application for 835 View St unless I provided my social insurance number for a credit check. Although I explained that a SIN is not necessary for a credit check and that I cannot be required to provide it, they refused to process my application. Interestingly, the Better Business Bureau refused to accept my complaint on this, despite the fact that the government strongly recommends against collecting SINs.

I didn’t end up renting either of these places, so I’m not going to go through the Residential Tenancy Branch’s official dispute process (although I did email a complain). The fact that property management companies act like this tells me that most tenants don’t know their rights. I think it should be illegal to request a social insurance number for non-employment, non-tax purposes.

Every individual landlord I’ve dealt with in BC knows and follows the law better than the employees of the companies above. I can also recommend Duttons in Victoria.

Homework: ICBC should be Privatized

Friday, February 12th, 2010

There are some reasons why BC should consider privatizing ICBC and opening the primary insurance market to competition:

ICBC has a legislated monopoly on a low-elasticity good: primary insurance is legally required and few consumers are willing to go without a car. If ICBC were a private sector company, they would increase the price of primary insurance to maximize profits. Since ICBC does not have a mandate to profit, they do not maximize the price but they also do not minimize it. A primary insurance market with competition should result in lower prices.

Since ICBC is not collecting a profit from the non-minimal prices, where else is the money going? It is being passed along to their suppliers. ICBC’s bigger supplier, by far, is their employees. Employees in monopolies engage in “rent seeking”: earning a higher wage by virtue of their position in the market. A market with competition of employers should result in lower wages (the savings passed on to consumers).

ICBC’s employees also have no incentives to work smarter: there’s no competition attacking their market share and, as public sector employees, their pay is not linked to company performance. Competition in a market increases productivity. Existing firms invest and innovate to increase their competitiveness and new firms grab a share of the market through innovation. Higher productivity results in lower cost.

As the sole supplier, ICBC has less incentive and opportunity to innovate. For example, many economists advocate pay-as-you-drive insurance rates. But ICBC has no reason to implement changes without political will. A competitive market would produce more innovative services.

Recent scandals at ICBC demonstrate a sense of entitlement. Employees of a monopolist feel that they “own” the market. Being a Crown corporation under control of a Minister opens the door to political meddling. Consumers would receive higher quality from independent organizations.