Home ยป Amanda Knox: Innocent?

with 3 comments

There’s a summary article in The Stranger, photos included, by someone who actually knew her and seems to have closely followed the trial — more horse’s mouth, perhaps, than the drug-fueled media portrayals.

A woman with condoms, weed, and a vibrator does not a psychopath make — and thank God!

Here’s the CBS story on the case (via Friends of Amanda):

Written by Jack

December 11th, 2009 at 7:08 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

3 Responses to 'Amanda Knox: Innocent?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Amanda Knox: Innocent?'.

  1. Out of curiosity, why would a Canadian care about this case? (Wait, I can guess: because Dan Savage told you it matters?)

    Granted, it’s amusing to watch a country that practices extraordinary rendition, violates the Geneva Conventions and imposes the death penalty is criticizing a legal system bound by the European Convention on Human Rights.

    Jared

    14 Dec 09 at 10:41 am

  2. No, this one’s all me. The citizens of Cascadia are also my countrypeeps. I was angry, too, when those Israeli bulldozers rolled over Rachel Corrie.

    And, yeah, there’s a sex-and-drugs positivity angle here which I’m big on.

    Jack

    14 Dec 09 at 12:36 pm

  3. [...] Amanda KNox: Innocent! [...]

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.